|
Notes from National
Alliance Technology Task Force November
15, 2001 - 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. Washington
Dulles Airport Marriott A.
Attendees The following organizations/governmental jurisdictions were represented: (See Attachment A for representatives and contact information.)
|
|
|
American Institute of Architects City of San Jose, California Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania Fairfax County, Virginia FIATECH International Alliance for Interoperability |
International Code Council National
Association of State Chief
Information Officers NCSBCS National Governors Association National Institute of Building Sciences National
Institute of Standards and
Technology |
|
B. Bob Wible, NCSBCS, gave an update on current activities of the National Alliance for Building Regulatory Reform in the Digital Age and the role of the Technology Task Force.
C. Greg Lindsay, NCSBCS, went over the goals, tasks, and milestones for the Task Force as set out in the Action Agenda established at the national forum and follow-up meeting of co-sponsors (see Attachment B). The purpose of this first meeting of the task force is to assemble a mission statement; identify the needs of the task force (information and resources); develop a preliminary plan, and identify issues needing to be resolved by other project committees.
D. Representatives from the following organizations provided information on their current projects: National
Association of State Chief Information Officers
- Cheryl
Edwards, IT Architecture Issues Coordinator International
Alliance for Interoperability -
Rich
Geissler, Executive Director FIATECH
- Barbara
Newland, Chief, Marketing & Membership City of San Jose, California– Amal Sinha, Deputy Director/Chief Building Official Fairfax County, Virginia– Stephen Garnier, Code Enforcement Coordinator National Institute of Building Sciences– David Harris, President
E. The following list of issues were discussed as potential work products for the task force. Most can be categorized as “low hanging fruit”. This list will be sent out for members to prioritize. Near-term products (low hanging fruit) ·
Inventory
of I.T. being used – what is out there and associated costs (HUD PATH
initiative) ·
NASCIO
architecture work product ·
Model
legislation for Uniform Electronic Transactions (electronic signatures) ·
Federal
e-government task force – Find out if it is relevant to this project.
(Mark Forman at OMB) ·
NCSBCS
Streamlining initiative – case studies/models.
Focus on streamlining I. T. programs. ·
NCSBCS
I. T. survey – Where are they in process; barriers encountered ·
Resources
to look at procurement for a system, i.e., use of IFC’s. ·
National
model standardized application form ·
Summarize
what is available elsewhere in the world and how it works. Long-term products
·
Have
a group provide alternative models to look at the building regulatory
process in different ways. · How to rationalize (expedite) the permit process -- quality assurance --public health and safety process. F.
Other subjects discussed: Identify
who needs to be at this table, i.e., Mortgage Bankers Association
(financial); Owners Alliance (headed by Bill Hoy); Realcom (Rich
Geissler to talk with them); software association/companies. Quantify
“better, safer, and at less cost” .
This would provide the impetus for change. G.
Date and Location of
Next Task Force Meeting IAI
invited the Technology Task Force to a meet in Atlanta December 12.
Rich Geissler said he would host the meeting and provide
demonstrations of IFC technlogy that would aid jurisdictions in
implementing a program of receiving and approving commercial building
plans. These demonstratons
would be made by special guests from Germany, England, and Singapore to
present work being done in their countries to initiate such programs.
A show of hands indicated that five or six members might be able
to attend. The
meeting adjourned at 5:15 p.m. Appendix
B
Members
Short-term Tasks and Milestones:l3 to 12 months
Long-term Tasks and Milestones1 to 5 years
Today’s Objective - Assemble a mission statement - Identify the needs of the Technology Task Force
- Develop preliminary plan
- Identify issues needing to be resolved by other committees |
|