
MODEL # 98-8
Return to Technology Task Force Page
PROCESS 2000:
CUSTOMER SERVICE THROUGH INNOVATIVE
PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY
CITY OF SAN DIEGO
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Jurisdiction Statistics:
Regulatory Areas:
PROBLEM:
Permit Office Procedures - Inefficiencies
The City of San Diego needed a program to deal with the regulatory maze that builders faced when initiating new projects. Builders had multiple regulatory levels to navigate, numerous codes and regulations with which to understand and comply, and several unconnected contact points of which to keep track. Often, builders were frustrated by contradictions and inconsistencies in the application of codes, duplication and voids of information, and the lack of a clear method to reach decisions on issues in the process.
SOLUTION:
Single-Stop Permit Office and Customer Service Initiatives
Process 2000 was created to clarify and simplify the regulatory process by providing a one-stop permit center with procedures established with customer service as the primary goal.
DESCRIPTION:
The Process 2000 program is composed of the following key elements:
Below is a descriptive table outlining the changes made over the former system, emphasizing the improvements that were implemented. The table also stresses the concept of the customer having a "project" managed at one location, rather than applying for a series of different permits requiring processing at several different locations.
| PROCESS 2000 IMPROVEMENT |
BENEFIT TO THE CUSTOMER |
| Implemented a major restructuring to create the new Development Services Business Center (July 1995). | Simplifies authority for resolving conflicts in the development process and managing the process under one manager. |
| Opened the Citywide consolidated Single Entry Point (January 1996). | Customer enters system at one point instead of up to five places. Improves predictability. |
| Opened Citywide collocated and consolidated application intake (May 1996). | Customer submits one application instead of multiple permits in multiple locations. Saves time and improves consistency. |
| Opened Citywide team early assistance (January 1996). | Customer receives comprehensive information in one location instead of five. |
| Created new project manager classification and began hiring (May 1996). | Customer has a single point of contact for information and to resolve conflicts. Improves staff coordination and timeliness. |
| Collocated all over-the-counter plan checks for all disciplines (July 1996). | Customer can go to one location to receive approvals instead of to multiple floors. |
| Automated maps and data information completed for several geographic areas. | Access to real-time and accurate information. Improves accuracy and timeliness of information. |
| Entered final production of automated tracking system. | Customer can access commitments and project status at any time during the process. |
| Instituted electronic sign-in for major services (April 1996). | Customer can access service more quickly and reliably. |
| Offer field inspection requests by Interactive Voice Response (December 1995). | Customer can call an automated system for inspections during normal hours and after hours. Improves staff efficiency. |
| Offer Building Permit status by fax (December 1995). | Customer can receive building permit status quickly during normal hours or after hours. |
| Completed the field inspection analysis and a new design has commenced (February 1996). | Ultimately will improve predictability and timeliness in the field operations. |
EVALUATION BY STREAMLINING COMMITTEES:
Advantages
IMPLEMENTATION:
Process 2000 was first implemented in 1996 and anticipates system-wide completion by January 1999. The submitting party outlines the following four implementation steps:
1) Partnership with customers to develop a system that produces
results so that government and industry can both achieve their objectives;
2) Innovative employees who use options and can think "outside the box";
3) Elected officials willing to make changes that improve the regulatory climate; and
4) $150,000 in computer costs for the pilot program and a later
5% surcharge in development fees which sunsets in four years to pay for technology
upgrades.
FOR MORE INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE IN CONSIDERING THE USE
OF THIS MODEL, PLEASE CONTACT:
Jack Brandais
Senior Public Information Officer
City of San Diego Development Services
1222 First Avenue, Mail Station 401
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: (619) 236-7703
FAX (619) 236-6030
Email: jhb@proc2000.sannet.gov
Or NCSBCS STAFF:
Carolyn Fitch
National Conference of States on Building Codes and Standards
505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 210
Herndon, VA 20170
Phone: (703) 437-0100
FAX: (703) 481-3596
Email: cfitch@ncsbcs.org