|
|
|
Streamlining Best Practices |
|
The Industrialized Buildings Commission
An Interstate Compact |
|
|
|
|
Built in one state or community under a factory
quality control system and then transported and sited elsewhere, often in
another state |
|
Providing increasing numbers of the
nation’s: classrooms, specialized
medical structures (for MRI and other diagnostic equipment),
telecommunications structures, prisons, small commercial buildings,
residential units, and hotels |
|
|
|
|
Growth and savings from its economies of scale
and quality control |
|
Year round construction and speed of assembly |
|
|
|
|
36 states regulate design and construction
statewide/rest regulate locally |
|
Conflicting, duplicative, overlapping
regulations often force manufacturers to overbuild all their units to the
most stringent code they ship their buildings to |
|
Industry subjected to multiple inspections of
units |
|
States and in some cases local governments must
hire and maintain regulatory staffs who must travel nationwide to conduct
such duplicative oversight inspections |
|
|
|
|
States and industry held series of meetings at
NCSBCS in the late 1980s discussing ways to streamline the regulatory
process and enable the growth of interstate reciprocity system for such
structures. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCSBCS worked together with: |
|
Council of State Governments, National Governors
Association, and National Association of Attorneys General |
|
Developed model enabling legislation to
establish an interstate compact to help states develop and adopt common
administrative rules, regulations, processes and procedures governing the
design and construction of industrialized buildings and a formal interstate
reciprocity system |
|
|
|
|
|
Help states and this industry to enhance the
efficiency and effectiveness while reducing the cost of the oversight
system for such buildings by: |
|
adopting streamlined and uniform administrative
processes and procedures regarding the design and construction of such
buildings |
|
facilitating their more rapid movement across
the boundaries of participating states. |
|
|
|
|
Minnesota, |
|
New Jersey, |
|
and Rhode Island. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed through a consensus based “Rules
Development Committee” model rules, regulations, and uniform administrative
procedures which each Compact member state agreed to adopt |
|
Eliminating the need for manufacturers shipping
into their states to run their programs through multiple diverse
administrative requirements |
|
Model rules were adopted by the Commission and
its member states in 1994 and the compact became fully operational. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over 60,000 industrialized/modular buildings,
produced in over 30 states and Canada, had received IBC labels. Over 50,000 had been sited in one of the
Commission’s five participating states. |
|
The IBC and its programs are totally supported
through the sale of the Commission’s certification labels for such
products. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Commissioners |
|
The Rules Development Committee |
|
Interstate reciprocity and coordinated oversight
system |
|
|
|
|
The IBC does not preempt state laws. |
|
Member states agree to adopt and administer
within their states the administrative rules, regulations and procedures
developed by the IBC’s consensus based Rules Development Committee. |
|
This enables member states to improve their
efficiency and reduce their costs by consolidating similar services while
continuing to operate, staff, and enforce their industrialized buildings
program. |
|
|
|
|
Comes not only through uniform rules,
regulations and procedures but also through sharing information and
findings. |
|
The member states also reduce their operation
costs and eliminate redundant reviews and field inspections by working
together to share a common uniform plans review and monitoring program for
modular buildings. |
|
|
|
|
|
Each member state in the compact has: |
|
State governor appointed Commissioner who also
is the chief building regulatory official of the state |
|
Each of the three states in the compact and the
nation’s industrialized/modular building industry appoints one
representative to the Commission |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adopt and update the Model Rules, Regulations
and Procedures proposed by the Rules Development Committee |
|
Designate third-party agencies that oversee
production design and review the findings of the monitoring system and
where necessary, take coordinated action on approved third party agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
IBC wanted industry input to its program through
their participating on a consensus based Rules Development Committee: |
|
Drafted, proposed, and now maintains the model
administrative rules, regulations, processes and procedures under which the
IBC and its member states run their industrialized/modular building
programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four representatives each from state government,
modular builders (two commercial and two residential) |
|
Two private evaluation and inspection agencies |
|
Two consumer members |
|
|
|
|
The outcome of the Commission’s work is the
interstate reciprocity system |
|
Use of the Commission’s rules, regulations,
processes and procedures, and common coordinated oversight system, member
states grant each other full interstate reciprocity |
|
|
|
|
a modular building in one compact member state
can ship their IBC labeled unit into another IBC member state without any
further inspections other than that performed by the state in which the
unit was produced. |
|
|
|
|
IBC has an agreement with the Commonwealth of
Kentucky whereby Kentucky accepts industrialized (modular) buildings
bearing IBC certification labels. |
|
Also, the State of Wisconsin has an agreement
with the State of Minnesota that allows industrialized/modular buildings
manufactured in Minnesota and bearing an IBC certification label to be
sited in Wisconsin. |
|
National Conference of States on Building Codes
and Standards (NCSBCS) has served as the IBC’s secretariat providing
administrative and oversight support. |
|
|
|
|
The Industrialized Buildings Commission supports
and enhances productivity, innovation, affordability, and international
competitiveness in the American construction industry through nationwide
uniformity in codes, rules, regulations, and procedures and the elimination
of duplication in reviews, inspections and fees while assuring quality,
durability and safety in the built environment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
727 of units shipped into the state in FY ‘02 |
|
141 units built in the state in FY ‘02 |
|
|
|
|
Minnesota staff was required to visit
out-of-state modular plants to perform building code required
inspections. Staff schedules were
subject to frequent change due to modular inspections out of state. |
|
Minnesota staff was required to perform plan
reviews of out-of-state modular manufacturers. |
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, Minnesota staff acts as third party
for all in-state modular manufacturers. |
|
Minnesota staff, as a third party, audits
compliance with the approved in-plant quality assurance program |
|
Minnesota staff performs plan reviews and
quality assurance program approvals as the third party for Minnesota
manufacturers. |
|
(If we were not a third party, plan reviews,
plant audits and quality assurance program approvals would be done by an
IBC approved third party.) |
|
Education of municipal building officials
regarding modular buildings |
|
Scheduling of other required staff activities is
more efficient. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrialized Buildings Commission |
|
505 Huntmar Park Drive, Suite 210 |
|
Herndon, Virginia 20170 |
|
(703) 481-2022 |
|
www.interstateibc.org |
|
|
|